ArticleGenes2019
Food Tracking Perspective: DNA Metabarcoding to Identify Plant Composition in Complex and Processed Food Products.
Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteogenomic investigation of plant constituents in herbal beverages.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- Use of Multi-Locus Metabarcoding to Inform an Australian Government Biosecurity Response on the Origins of Suspected Illegal Plant Products.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- A digital PCR approach to assess the purity of oregano.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Detection and Quantification of Botanical Impurities in Commercial Oregano (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Benchmarking and Validation of a Bioinformatics Workflow for Meat Species Identification Using 16S rDNA Metabarcoding.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of residual plant DNA in bulk milk for Grana Padano PDO production by a metabarcoding approach.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Application of DNA barcoding for ensuring food safety and quality.Food science and biotechnology · 2022Review
- DNA metabarcoding for identification of species used in fish burgers.Italian journal of food safety · 2022Article
- A detailed workflow to develop QIIME2-formatted reference databases for taxonomic analysis of DNA metabarcoding data.BMC genomic data · 2022Article
- Strategies for molecular authentication of herbal products: from experimental design to data analysis.Chinese medicine · 2022Review
- Challenges in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants DNA Barcoding-Lessons from the Lamiaceae.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- DNA-Based Herbal Teas' Authentication: An ITS2 andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Molecular Approaches to Agri-Food Traceability and Authentication: An Updated Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- DNA Metabarcoding for Quality Control of Basil, Oregano, and Paprika.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Diversity in biology: definitions, quantification and models.Physical biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the main goals of the quality control evaluation is to identify contaminants in raw material, or contamination after a food is processed and before it is placed on the market. During the treatment processes, contamination, both accidental and economically motivated, can generate incongruence between declared and real composition. In our study, we evaluated if DNA metabarcoding is a suitable tool for unveiling the composition of processed food, when it contains small trace amounts. We tested this method on different types of commercial plant products by using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.