Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30934607›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Re-Evaluating the Protective Effect of Hemodialysis Catheter Locking Solutions in Hemodialysis Patients.

Chang-Hua Chen, Yu-Min Chen, Yu Yang, Yu-Jun Chang, Li-Jhen Lin, Hua-Cheng Yen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chang-Hua ChenDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan. chenchanghuachad@gmail.com.
Yu-Min ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan. 30855@cch.org.tw.
Yu YangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan. 2219@cch.org.tw.
Yu-Jun ChangEpidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan. 83686@cch.org.tw.
Li-Jhen LinCenter for Infection Prevention and Control, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan. 3344@cch.org.tw.
Hua-Cheng YenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan. 90211@cch.org.tw.
Changhua Christian Hospital · TW

Funding

Changhua Christian Hospital 107-CCHIRP-097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and exit-site infections (ESIs) are common complications associated with the use of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of routine locking solutions on the incidence of CRBSI and ESI, in preserving catheter function, and on the rate of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We selected publications (from inception until July 2018) with studies comparing locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters used in patients undergoing hemodialysis. A total of 21 eligible studies were included, with a total of 4832 patients and 318,769 days of catheter use. The incidence of CRBSI and ESI was significantly lower in the treated group (citrate-based regimen) than in the controls (heparin-based regimen). No significant difference in preserving catheter function and all-cause mortality was found between the two groups. Our findings demonstrated that routine locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters effectively reduce the incidence of CRBSIs and ESIs, but our findings failed to show a benefit for preserving catheter function and mortality rates. Therefore, further studies are urgently needed to conclusively evaluate the impact of routine locking solutions on preserving catheter function and improving the rates of all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

cathetereffecthemodialysismeta-analysisprotectiontrial sequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID30934607
PMCPMC6463196
OpenAlexW2923693504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.