Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30934111›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2019

Real-time monitoring and model-based prediction of purity and quantity during a chromatographic capture of fibroblast growth factor 2.

Dominik Georg Sauer, Michael Melcher, Magdalena Mosor, Nicole Walch, Matthias Berkemeyer, Theresa Scharl-Hirsch, Friedrich Leisch, Alois Jungbauer, Astrid Dürauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging for the analysis of biopharmaceuticals.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Rocky Road From Fed-Batch to Continuous Processing WithFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dominik Georg SauerAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Michael MelcherAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Magdalena MosorAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Nicole WalchBiopharmaceuticals Operations Austria, Manufacturing Science, Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias BerkemeyerBiopharma Process Science Austria, Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria.
Theresa Scharl-HirschAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Friedrich LeischAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Alois JungbauerAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-7728
Astrid DürauerAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-7697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process analytical technology combines understanding and control of the process with real-time monitoring of critical quality and performance attributes. The goal is to ensure the quality of the final product. Currently, chromatographic processes in biopharmaceutical production are predominantly monitored with UV/Vis absorbance and a direct correlation with purity and quantity is limited. In this study, a chromatographic workstation was equipped with additional online sensors, such as multi-angle light scattering, refractive index, attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Models to predict quantity, host cell proteins (HCP), and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) content simultaneously were developed and exemplified by a cation exchange capture step for fibroblast growth factor 2 expressed in Escherichia coliOnline data and corresponding offline data for product quantity and co-eluting impurities, such as dsDNA and HCP, were analyzed using boosted structured additive regression. Different sensor combinations were used to achieve the best prediction performance for each quality attribute. Quantity can be adequately predicted by applying a small predictor set of the typical chromatographic workstation sensor signals with a test error of 0.85 mg/ml (range in training data: 0.1-28 mg/ml). For HCP and dsDNA additional fluorescence and/or attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectral information was important to achieve prediction errors of 200 (2-6579 ppm) and 340 ppm (8-3773 ppm), respectively.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Ion ExchangeEscherichia coliFibroblast Growth Factor 2Models, ChemicalRecombinant ProteinsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredUp-RegulationFibroblast Growth Factor 2Recombinant ProteinsATR-FTIRdsDNAfluorescenceHCPMALSonline sensors

Identifiers

PMID30934111
PMCPMC6618329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.