ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2019
Real-time monitoring and model-based prediction of purity and quantity during a chromatographic capture of fibroblast growth factor 2.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative data augmentation and automated optimization of convolutional neural networks for process monitoring.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Technology transfer of a monitoring system to predict product concentration and purity of biopharmaceuticals in real-time during chromatographic separation.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2021Article
- White paper on high-throughput process development for integrated continuous biomanufacturing.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2021Review
- Challenges in the Development of Soft Sensors for Bioprocesses: A Critical Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging for the analysis of biopharmaceuticals.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2020Review
- A critical review of recent trends, and a future perspective of optical spectroscopy as PAT in biopharmaceutical downstream processing.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Review
- Fiberoptic-Coupled Spectrofluorometer with Array Detection as a Process Analytical Chemistry Tool for Continuous Flow Monitoring of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Real-time monitoring and model-based prediction of purity and quantity during a chromatographic capture of fibroblast growth factor 2.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2019Article
- The Rocky Road From Fed-Batch to Continuous Processing WithFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Process analytical technology combines understanding and control of the process with real-time monitoring of critical quality and performance attributes. The goal is to ensure the quality of the final product. Currently, chromatographic processes in biopharmaceutical production are predominantly monitored with UV/Vis absorbance and a direct correlation with purity and quantity is limited. In this study, a chromatographic workstation was equipped with additional online sensors, such as multi-angle light scattering, refractive index, attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Models to predict quantity, host cell proteins (HCP), and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) content simultaneously were developed and exemplified by a cation exchange capture step for fibroblast growth factor 2 expressed in Escherichia coliOnline data and corresponding offline data for product quantity and co-eluting impurities, such as dsDNA and HCP, were analyzed using boosted structured additive regression. Different sensor combinations were used to achieve the best prediction performance for each quality attribute. Quantity can be adequately predicted by applying a small predictor set of the typical chromatographic workstation sensor signals with a test error of 0.85 mg/ml (range in training data: 0.1-28 mg/ml). For HCP and dsDNA additional fluorescence and/or attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectral information was important to achieve prediction errors of 200 (2-6579 ppm) and 340 ppm (8-3773 ppm), respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.