Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30934024›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Availability of specific tools to assess patient reported outcomes in hip arthroplasty in Spain. Identifying the best candidates to incorporate in an arthroplasty register. A systematic review and standardized assessment.

Jorge Arias-de la Torre, Elisa Puigdomenech, Jose M Valderas, Jonathan P Evans, Vicente Martín, Antonio J Molina, Nuria Rodríguez, Mireia Espallargues

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge Arias-de la TorreAgency for Heath Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-9611
Elisa PuigdomenechAgency for Heath Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.
Jose M ValderasHealth Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P EvansHealth Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Vicente MartínCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Antonio J MolinaInstitute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of León, León, Spain.
Nuria RodríguezAgency for Heath Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia EspallarguesAgency for Heath Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.
Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Exeter · GBCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESSpanish Clinical Research Network · ESUniversidad de León · ESUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose1) To systematically review the available scientific literature regarding specific instruments developed and/or tested in a Spanish population, to assess these PROMs in hip arthroplasty; 2) to carry out a standardized assessment of their measurement properties; and 3) to identify the best tools for use in Spain in an arthroplasty registry context.

methodsA systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE and CINHAL was done. Furthermore, a standardized assessment of the questionnaires identified using the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes (EMPRO) tool was performed. All developments, validation and studies aiming to assess the measurement properties of PROMs in hip arthroplasty in the Spanish population were included. Data from the questionnaires on metric properties was taken into account to identify the best candidates for inclusion in a register.

resultsA total of 853 documents were found. After screening title and abstract, 13 full text documents were reviewed and 8 questionnaires adapted and validated to assess some of the aspects of hip arthroplasty in the Spanish population were identified. After the EMPRO assessment, 4 questionnaires showed suitable properties (WOMAC, OAKHQOL, mini-OAKHQOL and PFH).

conclusionsIn Spain, there are a few suitable hip-specific questionnaires currently available to assess PROMs in hip arthroplasty surgery. Some of the more widely used questionnaires, like the OHS and HOOS, have not been validated in the Spanish population until now. Identified tools are suitable for use in a clinical context, however their use in an arthroplasty register is more questionable due to the lack of validation studies of the widely used tools in other registers.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresRegistriesArthroplasty, Replacement, HipHumansPatient SelectionPsychometricsQuality of LifeReference StandardsSpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30934024
PMCPMC6443164
OpenAlexW2931039783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.