Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30933830›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychiatric research2019

Cognitive functioning as a predictor of response to comprehensive cognitive remediation.

Nicole R DeTore, Kim T Mueser, Jessica A Byrd, Susan R McGurk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychiatric research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Improving outcome of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: effects of cognitive remediation therapy.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Individual Alpha Peak Frequency Moderates Transfer of Learning in Cognitive Remediation of Schizophrenia.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole R DeToreDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 940 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: ndetore@bu.edu.
Kim T MueserDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 940 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: mueser@bu.edu.
Jessica A ByrdDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 940 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: jbyrd95@bu.edu.
Susan R McGurkDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 940 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: mcgurk@bu.edu.

Funding

Evaluation of BDNF as a Mediator of the Effects of Cognitive Remediation in persons with SMIR01MH077210 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MCGURK, SUSAN R. · 2006 to 2016
$4.1M
ACL HHS 90AR5018NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive remediation is aimed at reducing cognitive impairments in severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, but little is known about whether severity of cognitive impairment predicts benefit from this intervention. To address this question, this study aggregated data from five randomized controlled trials (N = 300) of a standardized comprehensive, multimodal outpatient cognitive remediation program, the Thinking Skills for Work program, and evaluated whether baseline level of cognitive impairment differentially predicted improvement in cognitive functioning following cognitive remediation vs. usual services. Using standardized scores of neuropsychological functioning to designate "low average," "moderate," and "severe" levels of cognitive impairment, participants with greater cognitive impairment were found to benefit differentially more from cognitive remediation than usual services compared to less cognitively impaired participants. The findings were unaffected by statistically controlling for participant demographic and clinical characteristics. The findings suggest that individuals with the greatest cognitive impairment, for whom cognitive remediation was developed, are also most likely to benefit from this intervention.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionCognition DisordersCognitive RemediationFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersNeuropsychological TestsSeverity of Illness IndexCognitionCognitive remediationNeuropsychological functioningSevere mental illnessThinking skills for work

Identifiers

PMID30933830
PMCPMC6486446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.