Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30933606›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2019

Adjusted Mortality Rates Are Lower For Medicare Advantage Than Traditional Medicare, But The Rates Converge Over Time.

Joseph P Newhouse, Mary Price, J Michael McWilliams, John Hsu, Jeffrey Souza, Bruce E Landon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health Care Spending, Use, and Financial Hardship Among Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Enrollees With Mental Health Symptoms.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of 7-Day Follow-Up With 6-Month Suicide Mortality Following Hospitalization for Suicidal Thoughts or Behaviors Among Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph P NewhouseJoseph P. Newhouse ( joseph_newhouse@harvard.edu ) is the John D. MacArthur Professor of Health Policy and Management in the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, in Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, in Boston; and the Harvard Kennedy School, in Cambridge, Massachusetts; and a faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge.
Mary PriceMary Price is a senior consulting data analyst at the Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston.
J Michael McWilliamsJ. Michael McWilliams is the Warren Alpert Foundation Professor of Health Care Policy, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.
John HsuJohn Hsu is director of the Clinical Economics and Policy Analysis Program at the Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and an associate professor in the Departments of Medicine and of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.
Jeffrey SouzaJeffrey Souza is a biostatistician in the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.
Bruce E LandonBruce E. Landon is a professor in the Departments of Health Care Policy and of Medicine and a faculty member in the Center for Primary Care, all at Harvard Medical School.

Funding

Tradeoffs in the Design of Public Long-Term Care BenefitsP01AG032952 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Bruce E. Landon · 2009 to 2026
$39.0M
NIA NIH HHS L30 AG032932NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overall mortality rates, adjusted for age, sex, and Medicaid status, in Medicare Advantage have been below those in traditional Medicare for many years. Much attention has been paid to the resulting issue of favorable selection in Medicare Advantage. The common study design used to estimate causal effects of Medicare Advantage on utilization and outcomes compares new Medicare Advantage beneficiaries immediately before and after enrollment in Medicare Advantage with beneficiaries who choose to remain in traditional Medicare. What has not been studied is the mortality experience of a cohort that initially chooses enrollment in Medicare Advantage versus one that chooses traditional Medicare. In this study we found that the adjusted mortality rate of a cohort newly enrolled in Medicare Advantage was initially well below that of a cohort newly enrolled in traditional Medicare, but the difference markedly decreased after five years. As a result, the common study design is flawed because it assumes that any initial difference in mortality risk remains constant after enrollment in Medicare Advantage. In other words, those initially choosing Medicare Advantage become sicker relative to traditional Medicare beneficiaries over five years. Whether the mortality rates would fully converge if a period longer than five years were observed is a topic for further research.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInsurance CoverageMaleMedicaidMedicareMedicare Part CMortalityRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentMedicareMedicare Advantagemortality riskselection

Identifiers

PMID30933606
PMCPMC6555557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.