Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932870›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

A Mobile Phone-Based Approach for Hearing Screening of School-Age Children: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.

Yuan-Chia Chu, Yen-Fu Cheng, Ying-Hui Lai, Yu Tsao, Tzong-Yang Tu, Shuenn Tsong Young, Tzer-Shyong Chen, Yu-Fang Chung, Feipei Lai, Wen-Huei Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. COVID-19 and the resurgence of telehealth in otolaryngology.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan-Chia Chu *Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics & Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0997-5168
Yen-Fu Cheng *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-5854
Ying-Hui LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4120-7289
Yu TsaoResearch Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6956-0418
Tzong-Yang TuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7287-9956
Shuenn Tsong YoungHolistic Education Center, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8862-8569
Tzer-Shyong ChenDepartment of Information Management, Tunghai University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8915-5057
Yu-Fang ChungDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tunghai University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7373-7201
Feipei Lai *Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics & Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7147-8122
Wen-Huei LiaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7852-4654
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTunghai University · TWMackay Medical University · TWResearch Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPure-tone screening (PTS) is considered as the gold standard for hearing screening programs in school-age children. Mobile devices, such as mobile phones, have the potential for audiometric testing.

objectiveThis study aimed to demonstrate a new approach to rapidly screen hearing status and provide stratified test values, using a smartphone-based hearing screening app, for each screened ear of school-age children.

methodThis was a prospective cohort study design. The proposed smartphone-based screening method and a standard sound-treated booth with PTS were used to assess 85 school-age children (170 ears). Sound-treated PTS involved applying 4 test tones to each tested ear: 500 Hz at 25 dB and 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz at 20 dB. The results were classified as pass (normal hearing in the ear) or fail (possible hearing impairment). The proposed smartphone-based screening employs 20 stratified hearing scales. Thresholds were compared with those of pure-tone average (PTA).

resultsA total of 85 subjects (170 ears), including 38 males and 47 females, aged between 11 and 12 years with a mean (SD) of 11 (0.5) years, participated in the trial. Both screening methods produced comparable pass and fail results (pass in 168 ears and fail in 2 ears). The smartphone-based screening detected moderate or worse hearing loss (average PTA>25 dB) accurately. Both the sensitivity and specificity of the smartphone-based screening method were calculated at 100%.

conclusionsThe results of the proposed smartphone-based self-hearing test demonstrated high concordance with conventional PTS in a sound-treated booth. Our results suggested the potential use of the proposed smartphone-based hearing screening in a school-age population.

Indexed as

Audiometry, Pure-ToneCell PhoneChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMass ScreeningProspective StudiesTaiwanValidation Studies as Topicaudiometry, pure-tonehearing testsmobile appstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30932870
PMCPMC6462890
OpenAlexW2935057220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.