ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019
A Statistical Model for Rigid Image Registration Performance: The Influence of Soft-Tissue Deformation as a Confounding Noise Source.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-specific image quality assessment for virtual histologic staining: checklist and guideline.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
- Statistical Surgical Process Modeling: Analysis of Workflow and Performance of Emerging Technologies in Image-Guided Spine Surgery.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Learning-based deformable image registration: effect of statistical mismatch between train and test images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft-tissue deformation presents a confounding factor to rigid image registration by introducing image content inconsistent with the underlying motion model, presenting non-correspondent structure with potentially high power, and creating local minima that challenge iterative optimization. In this paper, we introduce a model for registration performance that includes deformable soft tissue as a power-law noise distribution within a statistical framework describing the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in registration performance. The model incorporates both cross-correlation and gradient-based similarity metrics, and the model was tested in application to 3D-2D (CT-to-radiograph) and 3D-3D (CT-to-CT) image registration. Predictions accurately reflect the trends in registration error as a function of dose (quantum noise), and the choice of similarity metrics for both registration scenarios. Incorporating soft-tissue deformation as a noise source yields important insight on the limits of registration performance with respect to algorithm design and the clinical application or anatomical context. For example, the model quantifies the advantage of gradient-based similarity metrics in 3D-2D registration, identifies the low-dose limits of registration performance, and reveals the conditions for which the registration performance is fundamentally limited by soft-tissue deformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.