Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932801›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques2019

Incidentaloma Discoveries in the Course of Neuroimaging Research.

Emmanuel Stip, Jean-Philippe Miron, Marie Nolin, Geneviève Letourneau, Odette Bernazzani, Laurie Chamelian, Bernard Boileau, Mona Gupta, David Luck, Ovidiu Lungu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel StipFrom the Department of Psychiatry,Université de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Jean-Philippe MironFrom the Department of Psychiatry,Université de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Marie NolinFrom the Department of Psychiatry,Université de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Geneviève LetourneauInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Odette BernazzaniDepartment of Psychiatry,Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Laurie ChamelianFrom the Department of Psychiatry,Université de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Bernard BoileauDepartment of Psychiatry,Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Mona GuptaFrom the Department of Psychiatry,Université de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
David LuckInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Ovidiu LunguInstitut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal,Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAHôpital Louis-H Lafontaine · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ABSTRACTAmong healthy volunteers in psychiatric brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research studies, the prevalence of incidentalomas can be as high as 34%, of which 10% show clinical significance. An incidentaloma is a lesion found by coincidence without clinical symptoms or suspicion. Like lesions and other types of accidental findings, it is found in healthy individuals recruited to take part in psychiatric studies. The prevalence of these accidental findings among specific psychiatric populations remains unknown. However, a precise understanding of cerebral neuroanatomy, neuroradiological expertise, and an appropriate choice of fMRI exploration sequences will increase the sensitivity of identifying these accidental findings and enable researchers to address their clinical relevance and nature. We present recommendations on how to appropriately inform patients or participants of the accidental findings. Additionally, we propose specific suggestions pertaining to the clinical research setting aimed for investigators and psychiatrists. Unlike current articles pertaining to incidentaloma, the current report provides a distinct focus on psychiatric issues and specific recommendations for studies involving psychiatric patients.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesIncidental FindingsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingEthicsfMRILegal issuesNeuroethicsNeuroimagingNeurological practiceNeurology - EducationNeuropsychiatryNeurovascularPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID30932801
PMCPMC6536828
OpenAlexW2935455613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.