Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932354›Full record

ReviewArthritis care & research2020

Incomplete Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: What Remains After Application of American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria?

Wietske M Lambers, Johanna Westra, Marcel F Jonkman, Hendrika Bootsma, Karina de Leeuw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthritis care & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus: A scoping review.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wietske M LambersUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna WestraUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel F JonkmanUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hendrika BootsmaUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Karina de LeeuwUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incomplete systemic lupus (iSLE) is an acknowledged condition of patients with clinical signs of lupus who do not fulfill classification criteria for SLE. Some patients with iSLE have persistent mild disease, but others have serious organ involvement, and up to 55% progress to established SLE. Research on this subject could reveal predictive or diagnostic biomarkers for SLE. Ideally, it would become possible to discern those patients with critical organ involvement or a high risk for progression to SLE. This high-risk group might benefit from early treatment, which would preferably be confirmed in randomized controlled trials. This process would, however, require agreement on a definition of iSLE. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria was composed in order to diagnose SLE earlier. The present review outlines the clinical characteristics of iSLE after introduction of SLICC criteria and furthermore proposes a definition of iSLE with the aim of discriminating the high-risk group from those with a lower risk.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesTerminology as TopicAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID30932354
PMCPMC7217202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.