Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932248›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

The influence of spatial resolution on the spectral quality and quantification accuracy of whole-brain MRSI at 1.5T, 3T, 7T, and 9.4T.

Stanislav Motyka, Philipp Moser, Lukas Hingerl, Gilbert Hangel, Eva Heckova, Bernhard Strasser, Korbinian Eckstein, Simon Daniel Robinson, Benedikt A Poser, Stephan Gruber and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Hardware Considerations for Preclinical Magnetic Resonance of the Kidney.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  18. An integrated RF-receive/BScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stanislav MotykaHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp MoserHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-6197
Lukas HingerlHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gilbert HangelHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva HeckovaHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard StrasserHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Korbinian EcksteinHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Simon Daniel RobinsonHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benedikt A PoserDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8190-4367
Stephan GruberHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Siegfried TrattnigHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang BognerHigh Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInhomogeneities in the static magnetic field (B

methodsWhole-brain MRSI data was simulated for 3 spatial resolutions and 4 B

resultsAt 7T, we found up to a 3.4-fold improved nSNR (in the frontal lobe) and a 2.8-fold reduced linewidth (in the temporal lobe) for 1 cm

conclusionMRSI data quality benefits from increased spatial resolution particularly at higher B

Indexed as

AdultBrainFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioYoung AdultB0 field dependencyB0 inhomogeneitiesMR spectroscopic imagingsignal-to-noisespectral resolutionvoxel size

Identifiers

PMID30932248
PMCPMC6563461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.