Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932188›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Bayesian framework for robust seed-based correlation analysis.

Charreau S Bell, Nazirah Mohd Khairi, Zhaohua Ding, Don Mitchell Wilkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charreau S BellVanderbilt University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 400 24th Avenue S, Featheringill Hall, Room 254, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Nazirah Mohd KhairiVanderbilt University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 400 24th Avenue S, Featheringill Hall, Room 254, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Zhaohua DingVanderbilt University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 400 24th Avenue S, Featheringill Hall, Room 254, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Don Mitchell WilkesVanderbilt University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 400 24th Avenue S, Featheringill Hall, Room 254, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.

Funding

Resting State Connectivity in White MatterR01NS093669 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
NIH HHS NS093669NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne popular method of assessing brain functional connectivity (FC) is through seed-based correlation (SCA) analysis. One drawback of this method is when the seed location is varied slightly, the FC can vary dramatically. We propose a method superior to SCA, robust to variations in seed location, which confers a probabilistic interpretation.

methodsWe introduce a probabilistic method which generates a cloud of highly connected voxels to determine a stable set of voxels connected to the seed location (SC-SCA). This cloud can generate a correlation map or a probabilistic map. The method is applied to the default mode network (DMN) based on a posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) seed, and the auditory network (AN) as validation on a smaller network. A Bayesian interpretation is demonstrated through performing a maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation on the DMN. The advantages of the method are tested by performing stability analyses on its influential parameters. The method is extended to region-based SC-SCA, and then comparisons are made based on seed-based vs region-based versions of the methods SC-SCA vs traditional SCA. The statistical significance between the methods is assessed via a bootstrap method using the difference in medians of the standard deviation of the voxels for 16 subjects.

resultsThe proposed method, SC-SCA, is able to identify a set of regions - the DMN - that are known to be associated with and have high correlation with the PCC, and the method is also extensible to smaller networks as shown by its performance on the AN. Based on the certainty of the a priori distribution for MAP analysis, the method is able to identify regions with high probability of belonging to the DMN. The stability analyses demonstrated that substantial deviations from the initial seed locations in the sagittal, posterior transverse, and axial directions by ±10 mm do not cause substantial variation in the correlation network produced. Qualitative inspection of the average correlation maps garnered from the four methods showed that SC-SCA shows a larger amount of detail in FC connectivity as compared to SCA. Seed-based methods show higher detail and contrast in the maps in comparison with region-based methods. Quantitatively, the statistical tests between seed-based vs region-based and SC-SCA vs SCA revealed that there is no significant difference between the following methods: region-based SCA or region-based SC-SCA, and seed-based SC-SCA or region-based SC-SCA. However, there are statistically significant differences and advantages conferred between the following methods: seed-based SC-SCA over seed-based SCA, region-based SC-SCA over seed-based SCA, region-based SCA over seed-based SCA, and region-based SCA over seed-based SC-SCA. Finally, seed-based SC-SCA outperforms sphere-based SCA.

conclusionsThe proposed method offers several advantages over traditional SCA: robust single-seed FC estimation, novel Bayesian estimation capabilities, enhanced detail of brain structures, robustness to initial seed location, and enhanced consistency in the correlation maps generated. Region-based SC-SCA is equivalent or superior to all investigated methods, where seed-based SCA is inferior to all methods. The method confers improved single-seed SCA with the additional benefit of Bayesian estimation.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRestBayesiancorrelation analysisfunctional connectivityprobabilisticresting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID30932188
PMCPMC9559859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.