Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932149›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2019

Single primer enrichment technology as a tool for massive genotyping: a benchmark on black poplar and maize.

Davide Scaglione, Sara Pinosio, Fabio Marroni, Eleonora Di Centa, Alice Fornasiero, Gabriele Magris, Simone Scalabrin, Federica Cattonaro, Gail Taylor, Michele Morgante

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide ScaglioneIGA Technology Services s.r.l., via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Sara PinosioIGA - Istituto di Genomica Applicata, via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Fabio MarroniIGA Technology Services s.r.l., via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Eleonora Di CentaIGA Technology Services s.r.l., via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Alice FornasieroIGA - Istituto di Genomica Applicata, via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Gabriele MagrisDipartimento di Scienze Agro-alimentari, Università di Udine, Ambientali e Animali (DI4A), Udine, Italy.
Simone ScalabrinIGA Technology Services s.r.l., via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Federica CattonaroIGA Technology Services s.r.l., via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Gail TaylorCentre for Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michele MorganteIGA - Istituto di Genomica Applicata, via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy.
Istituto di Genomica Applicata · ITUniversity of Udine · ITInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe advent of molecular breeding is advocated to improve the productivity and sustainability of second-generation bioenergy crops. Advanced molecular breeding in bioenergy crops relies on the ability to massively sample the genetic diversity. Genotyping-by-sequencing has become a widely adopted method for cost-effective genotyping. It basically requires no initial investment for design as compared with array-based platforms which have been shown to offer very robust assays. The latter, however, has the drawback of being limited to analyse only the genetic diversity accounted during selection of a set of polymorphisms and design of the assay. In contrast, genotyping-by-sequencing with random sampling of genomic loci via restriction enzymes or random priming has been shown to be fast and convenient but lacks the ability to target specific regions of the genome and to maintain high reproducibility across laboratories.

methodsHere we present a first adoption of single-primer enrichment technology (SPET) which provides a highly efficient and scalable system to obtain targeted sequence-based large genotyping data sets, bridging the gaps between array-based systems and traditional sequencing-based protocols. To fully explore SPET performance, we conducted a benchmark study in ten Zea mays lines and a large-scale study of a natural black poplar population of 540 individuals with the aim of discovering polymorphisms associated with biomass-related traits. KEY

resultsOur results showed the ability of this technology to provide dense genotype information on a customized panel of selected polymorphisms, while yielding hundreds of thousands of untargeted variable sites. This provided an ideal resource for association analysis of natural populations harbouring unexplored allelic diversities and structure such as in black poplar.

conclusionThe improvement of sequencing throughput and the development of efficient library preparation methods has made it feasible to carry out targeted genotyping-by-sequencing experiments cost-competitively with either random complexity reduction systems or traditional array-based platforms, while maintaining the key advantages of both technologies.

Indexed as

PopulusZea maysBenchmarkingGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsAllegrobioenergy cropsgenotyping-by-sequencingGWASPopulus nigraSNPSPETtargeted genotypingZea mays

Identifiers

PMID30932149
PMCPMC6821380
OpenAlexW2931716683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.