Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932143›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Network inference performance complexity: a consequence of topological, experimental and algorithmic determinants.

Joseph J Muldoon, Jessica S Yu, Mohammad-Kasim Fassia, Neda Bagheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph J MuldoonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Jessica S YuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Mohammad-Kasim FassiaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Neda BagheriDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationNetwork inference algorithms aim to uncover key regulatory interactions governing cellular decision-making, disease progression and therapeutic interventions. Having an accurate blueprint of this regulation is essential for understanding and controlling cell behavior. However, the utility and impact of these approaches are limited because the ways in which various factors shape inference outcomes remain largely unknown.

resultsWe identify and systematically evaluate determinants of performance-including network properties, experimental design choices and data processing-by developing new metrics that quantify confidence across algorithms in comparable terms. We conducted a multifactorial analysis that demonstrates how stimulus target, regulatory kinetics, induction and resolution dynamics, and noise differentially impact widely used algorithms in significant and previously unrecognized ways. The results show how even if high-quality data are paired with high-performing algorithms, inferred models are sometimes susceptible to giving misleading conclusions. Lastly, we validate these findings and the utility of the confidence metrics using realistic in silico gene regulatory networks. This new characterization approach provides a way to more rigorously interpret how algorithms infer regulation from biological datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available at http://github.com/bagherilab/networkinference/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksBenchmarkingComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID30932143
PMCPMC6748731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.