Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932132›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2019

Low Dietary Protein Intakes and Associated Dietary Patterns and Functional Limitations in an Aging Population: A NHANES analysis.

J L Krok-Schoen, A Archdeacon Price, M Luo, O J Kelly, C A Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Protein Intake and Its Association With Meal Patterns and Dietary Patterns in a Swedish Population of Older Adults.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Strategies for minimizing muscle loss during use of incretin-mimetic drugs for treatment of obesity.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J L Krok-SchoenChristopher Alan Taylor, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, taylor.1043@osu.edu.
A Archdeacon Price
M Luo
O J Kelly
C A Taylor
The Ohio State University · USAbbott Nutrition (United States)

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Project-005UL1TR001430 · NCATS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BAIR-MERRITT, MEGAN H, CENTER, DAVID M. · 2015 to 2024
$52.3M
Transgenic CoreP30DK046200 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREENBERG, ANDREW S, PERISSI, VALENTINA · 1992 to 2021
$25.0M
TUFTS--FIELDINGP30AG031679 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Ravi Jasuja · 2008 to 2026
$23.9M
Optimizing Protein Intake in Older Americans with Mobility LimitationsR01AG037547 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI APOVIAN, CAROLINE M, BHASIN, SHALENDER · 2010 to 2014
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001430NIA NIH HHS P30 AG031679NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037547NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK046200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate protein intakes across demographic characteristics in relation to dietary patterns and functional outcomes in older adults.

designObservational and cross-sectional study.

settingNon-institutionalized participants from the 2005-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

participantsData from 11,680 adults were categorized into 51-60 years (n= 4,016), 61-70 years (n=3,854), and 71 years and older (n=3,810) for analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Adults were stratified by meeting or not meeting the protein recommendation (0.8 g/kg/d) to compare demographics, diet quality with Healthy Eating Index-2015, functional limitations, and other dietary intakes. Dietary recalls were collected using the multiple pass method. Data analyses were weighted to create a nationally-representative sample.

resultsDietary protein intakes were significantly lower in older age groups, with up to 46% of the oldest adults not meeting the protein intake recommendation. Participants consuming protein below the recommended intake level had significantly poorer diet quality across all age groups (P<0.01), however, overall diet quality was better in older adults. Those not meeting the protein recommendation were more likely to have intakes of other nutrients below recommended levels. Those below the protein recommendation had significantly more functional limitations across all age groups, while grip strength was significantly lower in those over 70 years old.

conclusionLower protein intakes, and lower diet quality and physical functioning are related in an aging population. Meeting the protein recommendation was linked to better overall diet quality and may be protective of lean mass; therefore, evaluation of individual characteristics which may affect protein intakes is crucial in supporting older adults to meet their protein needs.

Indexed as

DietPhysical Functional PerformanceAgedAgingCross-Sectional StudiesDietary ProteinsDiet, HealthyFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrientsNutritional StatusNutrition SurveysDietary ProteinsNutrientsDiet qualityphysical limitationsprotein intakes

Identifiers

PMID30932132
PMCPMC6507527
OpenAlexW2916546908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.