Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30932047›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2019

Learning one's genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk.

Bradley P Turnwald, J Parker Goyer, Danielle Z Boles, Amy Silder, Scott L Delp, Alia J Crum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Nocebo Effect: A Review of Contemporary Experimental Research.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Placebo and the law of identification.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bradley P TurnwaldDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. turnwald@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-8932
J Parker GoyerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Danielle Z BolesDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amy SilderDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alia J CrumDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
Harnessing Mindset in 21st Century HealthcareDP2AT009511 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CRUM, ALIA · 2016 to 2016
$2.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS DP2 AT009511NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people now access personal genetic risk estimates for diseases such as Alzheimer's, cancer and obesity

Indexed as

Genetic TestingObesityAdultAlpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTOCardiorespiratory FitnessCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePhysical ExertionRiskYoung AdultAlpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTOCREB1 protein, humanCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinFTO protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30932047
PMCPMC6874306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.