ArticleNature human behaviour2019
Prior shared success predicts victory in team competitions.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Content Analysis of Lay Definitions of Romantic Chemistry.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Competing Against Former Teammates Predicts Team Victory.Sports economics review · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the Perceived Benefits of Team-Interaction Training Questionnaire (PBTITQ) among undergraduates.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Diversity, networks, and innovation: A text analytic approach to measuring expertise diversity.Network science (Cambridge University Press) · 2023Article
- The anatomy of social dynamics in escape rooms.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- In search of diverse and connected teams: A computational approach to assemble diverse teams based on members' social networks.PloS one · 2022Article
- Structural balance emerges and explains performance in risky decision-making.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Quantifying Collective Performance in Rugby Union.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Debate over the impact of team composition on the outcome of a contest has attracted sports enthusiasts and sports scientists for years. A commonly held belief regarding team success is the superstar effect; that is, including more talent improves the performance of a team
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.