ArticleScientific reports2019
Identifying Rare Variant Associations in Admixed Populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Ancestry Inference and Its Application for the Genetic Mapping of Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Observational
- Local Ancestry Adjusted Allelic Association Analysis Robustly Captures Tuberculosis Susceptibility Loci.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An admixed population and its ancestral populations bear different burdens of a complex disease. The ancestral populations may have different haplotypes of deleterious alleles and thus ancestry-gene interaction can influence disease risk in the admixed population. Among admixed individuals, deleterious haplotypes and their ancestries are dependent and can provide non-redundant association information. Herein we propose a local ancestry boosted sum test (LABST) for identifying chromosomal blocks that harbor rare variants but have no ancestry switches. For such a stable ancestral block, our LABST exploits ancestry-gene interaction and the number of rare alleles therein. Under the null of no genetic association, the test statistic asymptotically follows a chi-square distribution with one degree of freedom (1-df). Our LABST properly controlled type I error rates under extensive simulations, suggesting that the asymptotic approximation was accurate for the null distribution of the test statistic. In terms of power for identifying rare variant associations, our LABST uniformly outperformed several famed methods under four important modes of disease genetics over a large range of relative risks. In conclusion, exploiting ancestry-gene interaction can boost statistical power for rare variant association mapping in admixed populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.