ArticleScientific data2019
The survey and reference assisted assembly of the Octopus vulgaris genome.
Article in Scientific data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant genome of the vampire squid reveals the derived state of modern octopod karyotypes.iScience · 2025Article
- Characterization of C2H2 superfamily expansions in cephalopods and their contribution to nervous system evolution.iScience · 2025Article
- A single-cell atlas of the bobtail squid visual and nervous system highlights molecular principles of convergent evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- De novo transcriptome analysis of the Indian squid Uroteuthis duvaucelii (Orbigny, 1848) from the Indian Ocean.Scientific data · 2024Article
- A chromosome-level reference genome for the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier, 1797).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Article
- The neural basis of visual processing and behavior in cephalopods.Current biology : CB · 2023Review
- Article
- Identifying Natural Bioactive Peptides from the Common Octopus (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Hologenome analysis reveals independent evolution to chemosymbiosis by deep-sea bivalves.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Better late than never: Optimising the proteomic analysis of field-collected octopus.PloS one · 2023Article
- Assembly-Free Detection and Quantification of Transposable Elements with dnaPipeTE.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Genetic confirmation ofFrontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Exploring the Potential of Metatranscriptomics to Describe Microbial Communities and Their Effects in Molluscs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Cell type diversity in a developing octopus brain.Nature communications · 2022Article
- MicroRNAs are deeply linked to the emergence of the complex octopus brain.Science advances · 2022Article
- Gene Recruitments and Dismissals in the Argonaut Genome Provide Insights into Pelagic Lifestyle Adaptation and Shell-like Eggcase Reacquisition.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- De novo transcriptome reconstruction in aquacultured early life stages of the cephalopod Octopus vulgaris.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Identification of LINE retrotransposons and long non-coding RNAs expressed in the octopus brain.BMC biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The common octopus, Octopus vulgaris, is an active marine predator known for the richness and plasticity of its behavioral repertoire, and remarkable learning and memory capabilities. Octopus and other coleoid cephalopods, cuttlefish and squid, possess the largest nervous system among invertebrates, both for cell counts and body to brain size. O. vulgaris has been at the center of a long-tradition of research into diverse aspects of its biology. To leverage research in this iconic species, we generated 270 Gb of genomic sequencing data, complementing those available for the only other sequenced congeneric octopus, Octopus bimaculoides. We show that both genomes are similar in size, but display different levels of heterozygosity and repeats. Our data give a first quantitative glimpse into the rate of coding and non-coding regions and support the view that hundreds of novel genes may have arisen independently despite the close phylogenetic distance. We furthermore describe a reference-guided assembly and an open genomic resource (CephRes-gdatabase), opening new avenues in the study of genomic novelties in cephalopods and their biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.