Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931495›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2019

A new approach for detecting abnormalities in mammograms using a computer-aided windowing system based on Otsu's method.

Saber Mohammadi-Sardo, Fateme Labibi, Seyed Ali Shafiei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saber Mohammadi-SardoDepartment of Radiology, School of Allied Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Fateme LabibiDepartment of Radiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Seyed Ali ShafieiNeurology and Neuroscience Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. sashafiei@muq.ac.ir.
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IRQom University of Medical Science and Health Services · IRRafsanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide. This study aimed to provide an automatic windowing method in mammograms, based on the principles of Otsu's thresholding function, to help radiologists more easily detect abnormalities on mammograms. A total of 322 mammographic images from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database were used in the present study. The image background was removed based on Otsu's method. After selecting the threshold in the computer-aided windowing (CAW) system, the pixel values were kept larger than the threshold and displayed on a grayscale. A radiologist evaluated images randomly before and after CAW. Using CAW, the radiologist correctly diagnosed all healthy images (207 images). A total of 115 mammograms were evaluated to differentiate malignancy from benign masses. All 63 benign images were accurately diagnosed after using CAW. Moreover, of 52 malignant images, all were accurately recognized as malignant except one, which was recognized as benign. Therefore, specificity and sensitivity were significantly improved to 98% and 99.6%, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to be 0.99. The study showed that the use of CAW can potentially lead to quicker image assessment and improve the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists in differentiating between benign and malignant masses on mammograms.

Indexed as

MammographyBreast NeoplasmsHumansRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedROC CurveTime FactorsBreast cancerComputer-aided diagnosisComputer-aided windowingROC curveThresholding

Identifiers

PMID30931495
OpenAlexW2935626996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.