Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931487›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of implant dentistry2019

Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula.

Puria Parvini, Karina Obreja, Amira Begic, Frank Schwarz, Jürgen Becker, Robert Sader, Loutfi Salti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of implant dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07630701 (Comparison of Inverted Periosteal Flap Versus Buccal Advancement Flap for Closure of Post-Extraction Maxillary Sinus Perforation), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07630701 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Inverted Periosteal Flap Versus Buccal Advancement Flap for Closure of Post-Extraction Maxillary Sinus Perforation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArab International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsOroantral CommunicationArmsInverted Buccal Periosteal Flap, Buccal Advancement Flap
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series Published Between 2015 and 2025 on the Use of Biomaterials for Closure of Oroantral Fistula.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Therapeutic Strategies in Recurrent Oral and Sinusal Fistulas: Case Report and Literature Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  11. [Application progress of collagen membranes in oral medicine].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. [Implant restoration for patient with two oroantral communications treated by staged surgeries: a case report].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Puria ParviniDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Karina ObrejaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. obreja@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-0020
Amira BegicDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frank SchwarzDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jürgen BeckerDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Robert SaderDepartment for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Loutfi SaltiDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After removal of a dental implant or extraction of a tooth in the upper jaw, the closure of an oroantral fistula (OAF) or oroantral communication (OAC) can be a difficult problem confronting the dentist and surgeon working in the oral and maxillofacial region. Oroantral communication (OAC) acts as a pathological pathway for bacteria and can cause infection of the antrum, which further obstructs the healing process as it is an unnatural communication between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus. There are different ways to perform the surgical closure of the OAC. The decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula is influenced by many factors. Consequently, it requires a combination of knowledge, experience, and information gathering. Previous narrative research has focused on assessments and comparisons of various surgical techniques for the closure of OAC/OAF. Thus, the decision-making process has not yet been described comprehensively.The present study aims to illustrate all the factors that have to be considered in the management of OACs and OAFs that determine optimal treatment.

Indexed as

Complication managementDecisionFistulaFlapsGraftsMaxillary sinusOral surgeryOroantralOroantral communication

Identifiers

PMID30931487
PMCPMC6441669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.