ArticleMicrophysiological systems2018
3D bioprinting for modelling vasculature.
Article in Microphysiological systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomedical Materials and Fabrication Methods for Construction of In Vitro Neurovascular Unit Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Progressing Regenerative Medicine: Integrating Bioprinting Platforms for Stem Cell Applications.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Rheological, Structural, and Biological Trade-Offs in Bioink Design for 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Feasibility and practicality of a novel teaching aid for microvascular anastomosis simulation training in neurosurgery generated by 3D printing.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances and Challenges of Bioassembly Strategies in Neurovascular In Vitro Modeling: An Overview of Current Technologies with a Focus on Three-Dimensional Bioprinting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Unlocking the Future: Bioprinting Salivary Glands-From Possibility to Reality.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Advancement in Cancer Vasculogenesis Modeling through 3D Bioprinting Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing biomedical research: The imperative need for heart-kidney-connected organoids.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Advancements in Tissue Engineering: A Review of Bioprinting Techniques, Scaffolds, and Bioinks.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2024Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions for Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In vitro high-content tissue models to address precision medicine challenges.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2023Review
- Realizations of vascularized tissues: FromBiophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Bioprinting Technologies and Bioinks for Vascular Model Establishment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Human mini-blood-brain barrier models for biomedical neuroscience research: a review.Biomaterials research · 2022Review
- Recent advances in organoid engineering: A comprehensive review.Applied materials today · 2022Article
- Natural Materials for 3D Printing and Their Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Microfluidic bioprinting of tough hydrogel-based vascular conduits for functional blood vessels.Science advances · 2022Article
- Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Shear Stress Influence on Cellular Viability in Serpentine Vascular Channels.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Though
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.