Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931418›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2018

Circadian toxicity of environmental pollution. Inhalation of polluted air to give a precedent.

Petra Haberzettl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ambient PMBMC public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Circadian rhythms in cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Fine particulate matter (PMThe Science of the total environment · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrative Analysis of Rhythmicity: From Biology to Urban Environments and Sustainability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. When the clock ticks wrong with COVID-19.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Petra HaberzettlDiabetes and Obesity Center, Institute of Molecular Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Air Pollution, Circadian Rhythm Disruption and Cardiometabolic DiseaseR01ES027881 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HABERZETTL, PETRA · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposures to environmental stressors that derive from pollution (e.g. air, light) or lifestyle choices (e.g. diet, activity, 24-hour-×-7-day) are associated with adverse human health outcomes. For instance, there is evidence that air pollution exposure and changes in sleep/wake pattern increase the risk for vascular and cardiometabolic disorders. Interestingly, air pollution exposure affects pulmonary and cardiovascular functions that follow circadian rhythmicity and increases the risk for pulmonary and cardiovascular events that occur in diurnal patterns suggesting a link between air pollution induced cardiovascular and pulmonary injury and changes in circadian rhythm. Indeed, recent research identified circadian rhythm as an air pollution target and circadian rhythm as factor that increases air pollution sensitivity. Using air pollution exposure as precedent, this review highlights research on how environmental pollution affect circadian rhythm and how circadian rhythm affects the toxicity of environmental stressors.

Identifiers

PMID30931418
PMCPMC6438195
OpenAlexW2803779492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.