Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931232›Full record

ArticleCrime science2018

Towards a 'smart' cost-benefit tool: using machine learning to predict the costs of criminal justice policy interventions.

Matthew Manning, Gabriel T W Wong, Timothy Graham, Thilina Ranbaduge, Peter Christen, Kerry Taylor, Richard Wortley, Toni Makkai, Pierre Skorich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crime science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew Manning1ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-4936
Gabriel T W Wong1ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9572-1561
Timothy Graham2Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Thilina Ranbaduge2Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Peter Christen2Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Kerry Taylor2Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Richard Wortley3Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK.
Toni Makkai1ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Pierre SkorichAustralian Public Service, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Manning Cost-Benefit Tool (MCBT) was developed to assist criminal justice policymakers, policing organisations and crime prevention practitioners to assess the benefits of different interventions for reducing crime and to select those strategies that represent the greatest economic return on investment. DISCUSSION: A challenge with the MCBT and other cost-benefit tools is that users need to input, manually, a considerable amount of point-in-time data, a process that is time consuming, relies on subjective expert opinion, and introduces the potential for data-input error. In this paper, we present and discuss a conceptual model for a 'smart' MCBT that utilises machine learning techniques. SUMMARY: We argue that the Smart MCBT outlined in this paper will overcome the shortcomings of existing cost-benefit tools. It does this by reintegrating individual cost-benefit analysis (CBA) projects using a database system that securely stores and de-identifies project data, and redeploys it using a range of machine learning and data science techniques. In addition, the question of what works is respecified by the Smart MCBT tool as a data science pipeline, which serves to enhance CBA and reconfigure the policy making process in the paradigm of open data and data analytics.

Indexed as

Cost–benefit analysisCost–benefit toolsData scienceMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID30931232
PMCPMC6404784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.