Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931158›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2019

Implementation and Validation of an Analytical Method for Lincomycin Determination in Feathers and Edible Tissues of Broiler Chickens by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Aldo Maddaleno, Ekaterina Pokrant, Francisca Yanten, Betty San Martin, Javiera Cornejo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aldo MaddalenoLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808 Santiago, Chile.
Ekaterina PokrantFood Safety Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808 Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1562-955X
Francisca YantenFood Safety Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808 Santiago, Chile.
Betty San MartinLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808 Santiago, Chile.
Javiera CornejoFood Safety Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808 Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-9562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have detected different antimicrobial residues in broiler chicken feathers, where they persisted for longer periods of time and at greater concentrations than in edible tissues. However, until today, lincomycin behaviour in this nonedible tissue has not been assessed yet. Considering this, an analytical methodology to detect and quantify this antibiotic concentration in feathers, muscle, and liver tissues from broiler chickens was implemented and in-house validated. The methodology will allow the determination of the bioaccumulation of this highly persistent antibiotic in feathers of treated birds. For this purpose, 98% lincomycin and 95% lincomycin D3 standards were used. Methanol was selected as the extraction solvent, and Chromabond® Florisil® cartridges were used for the clean-up stage. The separation of analytes was performed through the analytical column SunFire C18 with a running time of 4 minutes, and the instrumental analysis was performed through an LC-MS/MS, with a liquid chromatograph Agilent® 1290 Infinity, coupled to an AB SCIEX® API 5500 mass spectrometer. An internal protocol for an in-house validation was designed based on recommendations from Commission Decision 2002/657/EC and the Guidance document on the estimation of limit of detection and limit of quantification for measurements in the field of contaminants in feed and food. The average retention time for lincomycin was 2.255 min (for quantifier ion, 126.0). The calibration curves showed a coefficient of determination (

Identifiers

PMID30931158
PMCPMC6410436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.