ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2018
Optimization of sampling rate and smoothing improves classification of high frequency power in electrocorticographic brain signals.
Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flexible regulation of representations on a drifting manifold enables long-term stable complex neuroprosthetic control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Classification of Articulator Movements and Movement Direction from Sensorimotor Cortex Activity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Repeated Vowel Production Affects Features of Neural Activity in Sensorimotor Cortex.Brain topography · 2019Article
- The influence of prior pronunciations on sensorimotor cortex activity patterns during vowel production.Journal of neural engineering · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHigh-frequency band (HFB) activity, measured using implanted sensors over the cortex, is increasingly considered as a feature for the study of brain function and the design of neural-implants, such as Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs). One common way of extracting these power signals is using a wavelet dictionary, which involves the selection of different temporal sampling and temporal smoothing parameters, such that the resulting HFB signal best represents the temporal features of the neuronal event of interest. Typically, the use of neuro-electrical signals for closed-loop BCI control requires a certain level of signal downsampling and smoothing in order to remove uncorrelated noise, optimize performance and provide fast feedback. However, a fixed setting of the sampling and smoothing parameters may lead to a suboptimal representation of the underlying neural responses and poor BCI control. This problem can be resolved with a systematic assessment of parameter settings. APPROACH: With classification of HFB power responses as performance measure, different combinations of temporal sampling and temporal smoothing values were applied to data from sensory and motor tasks recorded with high-density and standard clinical electrocorticography (ECoG) grids in 12 epilepsy patients. MAIN
resultsThe results suggest that HFB ECoG responses are best performed with high sampling and subsequent smoothing. For the paradigms used in this study, optimal temporal sampling ranged from 29 Hz to 50 Hz. Regarding optimal smoothing, values were similar between tasks (0.1-0.9 s), except for executed complex hand gestures, for which two optimal possible smoothing windows were found (0.4-0.6 s and 0.9-2.7 s). SIGNIFICANCE: The range of optimal values indicates that parameter optimization depends on the functional paradigm and may be subject-specific. Our results advocate a methodical assessment of parameter settings for optimal decodability of ECoG signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.