Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931121›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with localized prostate cancer: Comparison with younger patients (aged <75 years).

Hidekazu Tanaka, Yuka Nakashima, Masaya Ito, Takahiro Yamaguchi, Kae Esaki, Shingo Kamei, Satoshi Ishihara, Masahide Hayashi, Shinichi Ogawa, Satoshi Goshima and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hidekazu TanakaDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Yuka NakashimaDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Masaya ItoDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Takahiro YamaguchiDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Kae EsakiDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Shingo KameiDepartment of Urology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Gifu 505-8503, Japan.
Satoshi IshiharaDepartment of Urology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Gifu 505-8503, Japan.
Masahide HayashiDepartment of Radiology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Gifu 505-8503, Japan.
Shinichi OgawaDepartment of Radiology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Gifu 505-8503, Japan.
Satoshi GoshimaDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Masayuki MatsuoDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for elderly patients with prostate cancer (age ≥75 years) compared with younger patients (<75 years). The numbers of patients enrolled into the elderly and younger groups were 238 and 853, respectively. More than half of the patients in the elderly group were high-risk, and the total risk of the elderly group was higher than that of younger group. The median follow-up periods for the elderly and younger groups were 42 (range, 2-108) and 49 (range, 2-120) months, respectively. All patients were treated with IMRT at a dose of 74-78 Gy with or without androgen-deprivation therapy. The biochemical failure-free rates (BFFRs) at 3-year follow-up for the elderly and younger groups were 93.3 and 95.7%, respectively; there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regard to the BFFR. The clinical failure-free rates (CFFR) at 3-year follow-up for the elderly and younger groups was 95.8 and 98.5%, respectively; the 2 groups did not differ significantly in regard to the CFFR. The cumulative incidence rates of gastrointestinal toxicity (grade ≥2) and genitourinary toxicity (grade ≥2) at 3-year follow-up were 10.5 and 1.3%, respectively; there was no significant difference between the elderly and younger groups. It was concluded that in prostate cancer patients aged 75 years or older, IMRT has a treatment effect equivalent to that in patients <75 years old; adverse events are also comparable.

Indexed as

adverse eventselderly patientsexternal beam radiation therapyintensity-modulated radiation therapyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30931121
PMCPMC6425511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.