Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931040›Full record

ArticleHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2017

Combined transcranial and trans-spinal direct current stimulation in chronic headache: A feasibility and safety trial for a novel intervention.

Ghufran Alhassani, Julia Treleaven, Siobhan S M Schabrun

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07055373 (The Safety and Feasibility of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07055373 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Safety and Feasibility of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Randomized Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsWhiplash Associated Disorder (WAD)ArmsTransauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Interventional neuromodulation techniques for cervicogenic headache.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Update of Neuromodulation in Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ghufran AlhassaniBrain Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity Unit, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Julia TreleavenSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Siobhan S M SchabrunBrain Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity Unit, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Western Sydney University · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic primary headache disorders are associated with frequent, severe pain and significant functional impairment, with treatment remaining challenging.

objectiveWe examined the feasibility and safety of a novel brain [transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)] and spinal cord stimulation [trans-spinal cord direct current stimulation (tsDCS)] treatment in chronic headache.

methodsNine participants (3 males; aged, 40 ± 15 years) suffering from chronic daily headache, chronic tension-type headache, or chronic migraine received the combined brain and spinal cord intervention for 5 consecutive days. Stimulation was applied for a total of 40 minutes (20 minutes of tDCS followed by 20 minutes of tsDCS) at 1 mA. Pain sensitivity and headache symptoms (frequency, severity, duration, and medications recorded via a headache diary, 4 weeks before and after treatment) were assessed.

resultsThe treatment was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Headache frequency was reduced following the treatment (

conclusionThese data suggest that combined tDCS and tsDCS intervention is safe and feasible, and may improve headache frequency in patients with chronic primary headache disorders.

Indexed as

central sensitisationchronic painheadachenoninvasive brain stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30931040
PMCPMC6385152
OpenAlexW2591209979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.