Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30931011›Full record

ArticleAdvances in data analysis and classification2018

Ensemble of a subset of

Asma Gul, Aris Perperoglou, Zardad Khan, Osama Mahmoud, Miftahuddin Miftahuddin, Werner Adler, Berthold Lausen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in data analysis and classification, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asma Gul1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.
Aris Perperoglou1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.
Zardad Khan1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.
Osama Mahmoud1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.
Miftahuddin Miftahuddin1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.
Werner Adler4Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Berthold Lausen1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining multiple classifiers, known as ensemble methods, can give substantial improvement in prediction performance of learning algorithms especially in the presence of non-informative features in the data sets. We propose an ensemble of subset of

Indexed as

BaggingEnsemble methodsNearest neighbour classifierNon-informative features

Identifiers

PMID30931011
PMCPMC6404785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.