ArticleOncology letters2019
Application value of nursing intervention combined with early nutritional support in preventive stoma reversion of low rectal cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The comparison between experimental nursing and routine nursing interventions on the quality of life of stoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of microenvironment theory-based nursing on prognosis in intensive care unit patients with postoperative severe acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Micro video incentive nursing intervention improves the psychological state and quality of life in patients with rectal cancer after enterostomy.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Continuing Care Bundle in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection with Permanent Stoma.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application value of nursing intervention combined with early nutritional support treatment in preventive stoma reversion of low rectal cancer was explored. Ninety-two cases of low rectal cancer patients undergoing preventive stoma reversion from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients had closed fistula 3 months after neostomy. Forty-four cases with routine nursing care were the control group; 48 cases with early nutritional support and nursing intervention were the experimental group. Nutritional status, psychological status, incidence of adverse reactions, wound infection rate, number of shaped and regular defecation were compared in the two groups. The levels of albumin, prealbumin and serum total protein in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group after operation (P<0.05); the levels of albumin in the two groups after operation were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.001). The SAS and SDS scores in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group after operation (P<0.001); the SAS and SDS scores in the two groups after operation were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.001). The number of abdominal pain, abdominal distention, diarrhea, incision infection and abdominal infection in the experimental group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). The number of shaped and regular defecation cases in the experimental group was more than that in the control group (P<0.05). Nursing intervention combined with early nutritional support can improve the nutritional status, psychological anxiety-depression of the patients undergoing preventive stoma reversion, decrease the incidence of adverse reactions, and wound infection rate. It can also increase the shaped and regular defecation cases and is helpful for the recovery of intestinal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.