Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30930808›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Do We Adopt the Intentional Stance Toward Humanoid Robots?

Serena Marchesi, Davide Ghiglino, Francesca Ciardo, Jairo Perez-Osorio, Ebru Baykara, Agnieszka Wykowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural dynamics of mental state attribution to social robot faces.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Serena MarchesiSocial Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Davide GhiglinoSocial Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Francesca CiardoSocial Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Jairo Perez-OsorioSocial Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Ebru BaykaraSocial Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Agnieszka WykowskaSocial Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In daily social interactions, we need to be able to navigate efficiently through our social environment. According to Dennett (1971), explaining and predicting others' behavior with reference to mental states (adopting the

Indexed as

humanoid robotshuman–robot interactionintentional stancementalizingmental statessocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID30930808
PMCPMC6428708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.