ArticleZooKeys2019
A new species of terrestrial frog
Article in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revealing hidden biodiversity: Novel insights on reptile and amphibian distribution in western Ecuador.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Two new species of terrestrial frogs of theZooKeys · 2023Article
- Article
- A spectacular new species ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Six new species ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Red List assessment of amphibian species of Ecuador: A multidimensional approach for their conservation.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- A new giantZooKeys · 2019Article
- A new species of terrestrial frog of the genusPeerJ · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe a new species of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.