ArticleTest (Madrid, Spain)2018
Exact testing with random permutations.
Article in Test (Madrid, Spain), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clustering of Cerebral Microbleeds in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Flow Territory-Based Analysis.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Electrical bioimpedance spectral markers distinguish balance ability in older adults without provoking fall risk.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- How do my distributions differ? significance testing for the overlapping index using permutation tests.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Article
- A New Approach to the Nonparametric Behrens-Fisher Problem With Compatible Confidence Intervals.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
- Early and Late Buzzards: Comparing Different Approaches for Quantile-Based Multiple Testing in Heavy-Tailed Wildlife Research Data.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
- Multiple Environmental Factors Shaping Hopanoid-Producing Microbes Across Different Ecosystems.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Toward Power Analysis for Partial Least Squares-Based Methods.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
- Inference in generalized linear models with robustness to misspecified variances.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025Article
- Domain general frontoparietal regions show modality-dependent coding of auditory and visual rules.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Post-selection Inference in Multiverse Analysis (PIMA): An Inferential Framework Based on the Sign Flipping Score Test.Psychometrika · 2024Article
- A SIMPLE AND FLEXIBLE TEST OF SAMPLE EXCHANGEABILITY WITH APPLICATIONS TO STATISTICAL GENOMICS.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Selective inference for fMRI cluster-wise analysis, issues, and recommendations for critical vector selection: A comment on Blain et al.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Measure of Strength of Evidence for Visually Observed Differences between Subpopulations.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2024Article
- Studentized permutation method for comparing two restricted mean survival times with small sample from randomized trials.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Significant subgraph mining for neural network inference with multiple comparisons correction.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Biomarkers of professional cybersportsmen: Event related potentials and cognitive tests study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Better-than-chance classification for signal detection.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When permutation methods are used in practice, often a limited number of random permutations are used to decrease the computational burden. However, most theoretical literature assumes that the whole permutation group is used, and methods based on random permutations tend to be seen as approximate. There exists a very limited amount of literature on exact testing with random permutations, and only recently a thorough proof of exactness was given. In this paper, we provide an alternative proof, viewing the test as a "conditional Monte Carlo test" as it has been called in the literature. We also provide extensions of the result. Importantly, our results can be used to prove properties of various multiple testing procedures based on random permutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.