Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30930541›Full record

ArticleMinds and machines2018

AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.

Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, Robert Madelin, Ugo Pagallo, Francesca Rossi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Minds and machines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 331 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
331citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

331 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Responsible artificial intelligence integration framework for psychiatric guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligence.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Pooled it
  17. Introducing Adolescents to the Social Dimensions of AI through Story-Driven Game-Based Learning.Artificial intelligence in education : 27th international conference, AIED 2026, Seoul, South Korea, June 27-July 3, 2026, proceedings. Part VI. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (27th : 2026 : Seoul, Kore... · 2027
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

271 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luciano Floridi1Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-2280
Josh Cowls1Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Monica BeltramettiNaver Corporation, Grenoble, France.
Raja Chatila4French National Center of Scientific Research, Paris, France.
Patrice Chazerand6Digital Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Virginia Dignum7University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.
Christoph Luetge9TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Robert Madelin10Centre for Technology and Global Affairs, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ugo Pagallo11Department of Law, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesca Rossi12IBM Research, New York, USA.
Burkhard Schafer14University of Edinburgh Law School, Edinburgh, UK.
Peggy Valcke15Centre for IT & IP Law, Catholic University of Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Effy Vayena17Bioethics, Health Ethics and Policy Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society.

Indexed as

AI4PeopleArtificial intelligenceData governanceDigital ethicsEthics of AIGovernance

Identifiers

PMID30930541
PMCPMC6404626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.