ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2019
Evaluation of the cost and effectiveness of diverse recruitment methods for a genetic screening study.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update on the genetics of allergic diseases.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Parent-Child Agreement on Fatigue in Pediatric Otolaryngology Patients.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Recruitment and retention of participants with obesity into a longitudinal birth cohort: the Breastfeeding and Early Child Health (BEACH) study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Negative results from DNA-based population screening for adult-onset diseases: the recipients' experience.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of social media advertising as a recruitment tool: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Genetics for all: Tri-directional research engagement as an equitable framework for international partnerships.HGG advances · 2022Review
- Comparison of Web-Based Advertising and a Social Media Platform as Recruitment Tools for Underserved and Hard-to-Reach Populations in Rheumatology Clinical Research.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Article
- GeneLiFT: A novel test to facilitate rapid screening of genetic literacy in a diverse population undergoing genetic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- An electronic health record (EHR) log analysis shows limited clinician engagement with unsolicited genetic test results.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Modifiable Barriers for Recruitment and Retention of Older Adults Participants from Underrepresented Minorities in Alzheimer's Disease Research.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Review
- Choices, attitudes, and experiences of genetic screening in Latino/a and Ashkenazi Jewish individuals.Journal of community genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecruitment of participants from diverse backgrounds is crucial to the generalizability of genetic research, but has proven challenging. We retrospectively evaluated recruitment methods used for a study on return of genetic results.
methodsThe costs of study design, development, and participant enrollment were calculated, and the characteristics of the participants enrolled through the seven recruitment methods were examined.
resultsA total of 1118 participants provided consent, a blood sample, and questionnaire data. The estimated cost across recruitment methods ranged from $579 to $1666 per participant and required a large recruitment team. Recruitment methods using flyers and staff networks were the most cost-efficient and resulted in the highest completion rate. Targeted sampling that emphasized the importance of Latino/a participation, utilization of translated materials, and in-person recruitments contributed to enrolling a demographically diverse sample.
conclusionsAlthough all methods were deployed in the same hospital or neighborhood and shared the same staff, each recruitment method was different in terms of cost and characteristics of the enrolled participants, suggesting the importance of carefully choosing the recruitment methods based on the desired composition of the final study sample. This analysis provides information about the effectiveness and cost of different methods to recruit adults for genetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.