ArticleFertility and sterility2019
Perceived infertility and contraceptive use in the female, reproductive-age cancer survivor.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contraceptive use and contraceptive counselling interventions for women of reproductive age with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Contraception use and changes in young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.Fertility and sterility · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of a web-based women's health survivorship care plan for young breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Trial
- Engendering Reproductive Health Within Oncologic Survivorship Trial, ECOG-ACRIN E1Q11.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Hematology and Oncology Fellow Education About Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Survey of Program Directors in the United States.JCO oncology practice · 2024Article
- Contraception Use in Cancer Survivors, Clinical Practice and Patients' Preferences.Open access journal of contraception · 2024Review
- The effect of changing pregnancy intentions on preconception health behaviors: a prospective cohort study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Perceived and Objective Fertility Risk Among Female Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Contraceptive methods and fertility testing in young adult survivors of childhood cancer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Contraception in breast cancer survivors from the FEERIC case-control study (performed on behalf of the Seintinelles research network).Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2023Article
- Contraceptive Use in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Article
- Contraception Counseling and Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Female Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2020Article
- Reproductive intentions in childless female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.Fertility and sterility · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the association between perceived fertility potential and contraception use and to characterize factors important in contraceptive decision making in reproductive-age, female cancer survivors.
designCross-sectional study.
settingParticipants were from two state cancer registries, physician referrals, and cancer survivor advocacy groups in the United States. PATIENT(S): A total of 483 female survivors aged 18-40 years. INTERVENTION(S): Online questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Contraception use. RESULT(S): Eighty-four percent of participants used contraception; 49.7% used highly effective, World Health Organization tiers I and II methods (surgical sterilization, intrauterine devices, contraceptive implant, combined hormonal contraceptives, medroxyprogesterone acetate, progestin-only pills, contraceptive diaphragm). Contraception non-use was more common among survivors who perceived themselves to be infertile, compared with survivors who perceived themselves to be as or more fertile than similarly aged peers (prevalence ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 2.5-7.4). In mediation analysis that adjusted for clinical infertility, 59% of the association between prior chemotherapy and contraception non-use was explained by perceived infertility. Contraception efficacy (n = 62, 25.8%) and ease of use (n = 50, 20.8%) were the most cited reasons for using tier I/II methods; compared with lack of hormones (n = 81, 49.7%) as the predominant reason for using less-effective, tier III/IV methods. CONCLUSION(S): Although female, reproductive-age cancer survivors had high uptake of contraception, those who perceived themselves to be infertile were less likely to use contraception. Throughout survivorship, clinicians should counsel survivors on fertility potential in the context of their prior cancer treatments and on factors, including contraceptive efficacy and hormone-free contraception, that inform reproductive decision making in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.