Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3092969›Full record

ArticleBritish medical journal (Clinical research ed.)1986

Course of angina pectoris after an acute coronary event.

L E Daly, N Hickey, R Mulcahy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L E Daly
N Hickey
R Mulcahy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The course of postcoronary angina pectoris was examined in 555 men who had survived a first attack of myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Patients were aged less than 60 and were followed up yearly for up to 17 years. Only 25 (4.5%) had coronary artery bypass surgery. Most patients with angina were treated by nitrates alone. One year after infarction 24.1% of survivors (124/515) reported the presence of angina pectoris, and the proportions at five, 10, and 15 years were 29.9%, 30.4%, and 43.5% respectively. Seventeen years after the initial event 35.3% of the survivors had never reported postcoronary anginal symptoms. The patients who experienced anginal symptoms in the year after their coronary attack had a poorer long term survival than the group who were symptom free over the first year. These patients also had longer subsequent periods with angina, though in 41.7% angina resolved before death after a median of 2.9 years. Throughout follow up mortality during periods in which patients experienced angina was higher than in the symptom free periods. This long term follow up study of patients after a coronary event confirms that the presence or absence of angina may vary considerably over time in patients treated medically and that the presence of angina is associated with a poorer prognosis. These findings have important implications when assessing the effects of various treatment modalities on postcoronary angina, including coronary artery bypass surgery.

Indexed as

Angina PectorisCoronary DiseaseFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID3092969
PMCPMC1341510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.