ArticleBritish medical journal (Clinical research ed.)1986
Course of angina pectoris after an acute coronary event.
Article in British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic significance of angina pectoris experienced during the first month following acute myocardial infarction.Clinical cardiology · 1997Trial
- Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1994Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The course of postcoronary angina pectoris was examined in 555 men who had survived a first attack of myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Patients were aged less than 60 and were followed up yearly for up to 17 years. Only 25 (4.5%) had coronary artery bypass surgery. Most patients with angina were treated by nitrates alone. One year after infarction 24.1% of survivors (124/515) reported the presence of angina pectoris, and the proportions at five, 10, and 15 years were 29.9%, 30.4%, and 43.5% respectively. Seventeen years after the initial event 35.3% of the survivors had never reported postcoronary anginal symptoms. The patients who experienced anginal symptoms in the year after their coronary attack had a poorer long term survival than the group who were symptom free over the first year. These patients also had longer subsequent periods with angina, though in 41.7% angina resolved before death after a median of 2.9 years. Throughout follow up mortality during periods in which patients experienced angina was higher than in the symptom free periods. This long term follow up study of patients after a coronary event confirms that the presence or absence of angina may vary considerably over time in patients treated medically and that the presence of angina is associated with a poorer prognosis. These findings have important implications when assessing the effects of various treatment modalities on postcoronary angina, including coronary artery bypass surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.