Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30929577›Full record

ReviewThe veterinary quarterly2019

Contagious caprine pleuropneumonia - a comprehensive review.

Mohd Iqbal Yatoo, Oveas Raffiq Parray, Shah Tauseef Bashir, Riyaz Ahmed Bhat, Arumugam Gopalakrishnan, Kumaragurubaran Karthik, Kuldeep Dhama, Shoor Vir Singh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The veterinary quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. First identification ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohd Iqbal Yatooa Mycoplasma Laboratory, Division of Veterinary Clinical Complex Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry , Shuhama , Srinagar , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-7354
Oveas Raffiq Parraya Mycoplasma Laboratory, Division of Veterinary Clinical Complex Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry , Shuhama , Srinagar , India.
Shah Tauseef Bashirb Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , IL , USA.
Riyaz Ahmed Bhata Mycoplasma Laboratory, Division of Veterinary Clinical Complex Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry , Shuhama , Srinagar , India.
Arumugam Gopalakrishnanc Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine , Madras Veterinary College Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University , Chennai , India.
Kumaragurubaran Karthikd Central University Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University , Chennai , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9215-6306
Kuldeep Dhamae Division of Pathology , ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Izatnagar , Bareilly , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7469-4752
Shoor Vir Singhf Animal Health Division , Central Institute for Research on Goats (CIRG) , Mathura , India.
Veterinary & Animal Husbandry · INTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INCentral Institute for Research on Goats · INIndian Veterinary Research Institute · INUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contagious caprine pleuropneumonia (CCPP) is a serious disease of goats, occasionally sheep and wild ruminants, caused by Mycoplasma capricolum subspecies capripneumoniae (Mccp). The disease is characterized by severe serofibrinous pleuropneumonia, very high morbidity (∼100%), and mortality (80-100%). CCPP affects goats in more than 40 countries of the world thereby posing a serious threat to goat farming around the globe. The characteristic clinical signs of CCPP are severe respiratory distress associated with sero-mucoid nasal discharge, coughing, dyspnea, pyrexia, pleurodynia, and general malaise. In later stages, severe lobar fibrinous pleuropneumonia, profuse fluid accumulation in pleural cavity, severe congestion of lungs and adhesion formation is observed. Mycoplasmal antigen interactions with host immune system and its role in CCPP pathogenesis are not clearly understood. CCPP is not a zoonotic disease. Diagnosis has overcome cumbersome and lengthy conventional tests involving culture, isolation, and identification by advanced serological (LAT, cELISA) or gene-based amplification of DNA (PCR, RFLP, and hybridization) and sequencing. The latex agglutination test (LAT) is rapid, simple, and better test for field and real-time diagnosis applicable to whole blood or serum and is more sensitive than the CFT and easier than the cELISA. Moreover, the studies on antibiotic sensitivity and exploration of novel antibiotics (fluoroquinolones, macrolides) can help in better therapeutic management besides preventing menace of antibiotic resistance. Re-visiting conventional prophylactic measures focussing on developing novel strain-based or recombinant vaccines using specific antigens (capsular or cellular) should be the most important strategy for controlling the disease worldwide.

Indexed as

Goat DiseasesAnimalsGoatsMycoplasma capricolumPleuropneumoniaRuminantsSheepSheep DiseasescaprineGoatMycoplasmapleuropneumoniavaccine

Identifiers

PMID30929577
PMCPMC6830973
OpenAlexW2930572917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.