Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30929542›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2019

It's Not Too Late to Improve Statin Adherence: Association Between Changes in Statin Adherence from Before to After Acute Myocardial Infarction and All-Cause Mortality.

Ryan P Hickson, Jennifer G Robinson, Izabela E Annis, Ley A Killeya-Jones, Gang Fang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan P Hickson1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC.
Jennifer G Robinson3 Department of Epidemiology College of Public Health University of Iowa Iowa City IA.
Izabela E Annis1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC.
Ley A Killeya-Jones1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC.
Gang Fang1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC.

Funding

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Training GrantT32HL007055 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Wayne D. Rosamond · 1986 to 2026
$10.0M
National Health Literacy Mapping to Inform Healthcare PolicyR01AG046267 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAILEY, STACY C, FANG, GANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Should the elderly have lower dose of ACE inhibitors for prevention after AMI?R21AG043668 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FANG, GANG · 2013 to 2014
$417k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007055NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046267NIA NIH HHS R21 AG043668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Many older patients have a change in statin adherence-either an increase or a decrease-from before to after an acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ), but its association with mortality is unknown. Methods and Results Using Medicare administrative claims, a cohort of patients ≥66 years old with an AMI hospitalization from 2008 to 2010 was assembled. Statin adherence was measured for 180 days pre- AMI and 180 days post- AMI and categorized as severely nonadherent, moderately nonadherent, or adherent. Categorical change in statin adherence from pre- to post- AMI was assessed. Patients were then followed for up to 18 months for all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to estimate the effects of statin adherence change on all-cause mortality, adjusted for patient baseline characteristics. Of 101 011 eligible patients, 20% had a categorical increase in adherence, 16% decreased, and 14% remained nonadherent both pre- and post- AMI . Compared with patients who were always severely nonadherent (both pre- and post- AMI ), patients whose adherence increased from severely nonadherent to adherent (hazard ratio=0.83; 95% CI : 0.75-0.92) and patients who were always adherent (hazard ratio=0.88; 95% CI : 0.82-0.94) were less likely to die; patients whose adherence decreased from moderately nonadherent to severely nonadherent were more likely to die (hazard ratio=1.11; 95% CI : 1.01-1.22). Conclusions After an AMI , patients with decreased statin adherence had the worst mortality outcomes. However, patients with increased statin adherence had a similar risk of mortality compared with continuously adherent patients, suggesting that, even after an AMI , it is not too late to improve statin adherence.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMyocardial InfarctionSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsbehavior changemedication adherencemyocardial infarctionolder adultssecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID30929542
PMCPMC6509715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.