Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
12-Month clinical results of drug-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesion in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent for de Novo Lesions in Large Coronary Arteries Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography:a Prospective Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty for De-novo or in-Stent Restenotic Coronary Lesions: an Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Drug coated balloon angioplasty for de novo coronary lesions in large vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Prevention of in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting balloons in patients with postirradiated carotid stenosis accepting percutaneous angioplasty and stenting.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2023Trial
- A Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents on Angiographic Outcomes for Coronary De Novo Lesions.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2022Trial
- Mid-term outcomes of using drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of large vesselCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Mid-term outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloon for de novo non-small coronary lesions: a pooled analysis.BMC medicine · 2025Observational
- Advances in drug-coated balloons for the treatment of coronary artery de novo large-vessel lesions.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
- Drug-coated balloons in percutaneous coronary interventions: existing evidence and emerging hopes.Cardiology journal · 2025Review
- Clinical value of drug-coated balloon versus second-generation drug-eluting stent for de novo lesions in large coronary arteries: insights from the real world.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Observational
- Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of drug-coated balloon (2Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Drug-Coated Balloon for de-novo Coronary Artery Lesions Exceeding 2.5 mm in Diameter: Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis and Clinical Follow-Up.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Establishment of a Nomogram for Predicting the Suboptimal Angiographic Outcomes of Coronary De Novo Lesions Treated with Drug-Coated Balloons.Advances in therapy · 2023Article
- Clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon in coronary lesions: a real-world, all-comers study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Observational
- DCB combined with provisional DES implantation in the treatment of De Novo Medina 0,1,0 or 0,0,1 left main coronary bifurcation lesions: A proof-of-concept study.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2022Article
- Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy inFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Drug-coated balloons in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this observational study was to investigate the feasibility, initial safety, and efficacy of the SeQuent® Please DCB (B. Braun Melsungen, Germany) for patients with de novo coronary lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm in a consecutive series of all comer percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 120 patients (135 lesions) with de novo coronary lesions in vessels ≥ 3.0 mm treated with DCB were enrolled in this single-centre prospective observational study. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Safety endpoints included cardiac death, TV-MI, and definite target vessel thrombosis. 45.9% of the lesions were classified as complex (type B2/C). The reference vessel diameter was 3.09 ± 0.31 mm measured via quantitative coronary angiography analysis. Coronary dissections occurred in 42 patients (35.0%; Type A-B 14.1%; Type C 19.1%; Type D: 1.6%), two of which [1.6%; (type D dissection)] underwent bail-out stent implantation. 12-month follow-up was completed in 100% patients. The 12-month incidence of TLF was 3.4%. The clinically driven TLR occurred in four patients (3.4%). The incidence of TLR was low in patients without any detectable dissections, similar to those with dissections (3.8% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.146). No patient suffered cardiac death, TV-MI, or target vessel thrombosis. The study shows the feasibility, initial safety, and efficacy of coronary intervention using SeQuent® Please DCB for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in vessels exceeding 3 mm. The study highlights that the coronary dissection (Type A-C) post DCB treatment occurs frequently but is safe at follow up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30929102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.