Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30929093›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019

Extended Reality in Medical Practice.

Christopher Andrews, Michael K Southworth, Jennifer N A Silva, Jonathan R Silva

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04736888 (Comparison of Extended Reality and Conventional Methods of Basic Life Support Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04736888 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Extended Reality and Conventional Methods of Basic Life Support Training: Protocol for a Multinational Pragmatic Clinical Trial (XR BLS Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled154ConditionsBasic Cardiac Life Support, Virtual RealityArmsextended-reality CPR training, conventional CPR training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. When I say … extended reality.Medical education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Technological Advances in Pre-Operative Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The use of extended reality in anesthesiology education: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher AndrewsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA.
Michael K SouthworthSentiAR, Inc, 212 N Kingshighway Blvd, Suite #115, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA.
Jennifer N A SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA. jennifersilva@wustl.edu.
Jonathan R SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA. jonsilva@wustl.edu.

Funding

Using Augmented Reality To Make Cardiac Ablation Procedures Simpler and SaferR44HL140896 · NHLBI · SENTIAR, INC. · PI SILVA, JENNIFER N, SILVA, JONATHAN R · 2018 to 2019
$2.2M
Training in Integrative and Systems Biology of Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL134635 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NERBONNE, JEANNE M. · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL140896NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAdvances in display technology and computing have led to new devices capable of overlaying digital information onto the physical world or incorporating aspects of the physical world into virtual scenes. These combinations of digital and physical environments are referred to as extended realities. Extended reality (XR) devices offer many advantages for medical applications including realistic 3D visualization and touch-free interfaces that can be used in sterile environments. This review introduces extended reality and describes how it can be applied to medical practice. RECENT

findingsThe 3D displays of extended reality devices are valuable in situations where spatial information such as patient anatomy and medical instrument position is important. Applications that take advantage of these 3D capabilities include teaching and pre-operative planning. The utility of extended reality during interventional procedures has been demonstrated with through 3D visualizations of patient anatomy, scar visualization, and real-time catheter tracking with touch-free software control. Extended reality devices have been applied to education, pre-procedural planning, and cardiac interventions. These devices excel in settings where traditional devices are difficult to use, such as in the cardiac catheterization lab. New applications of extended reality in cardiology will continue to emerge as the technology improves.

Indexed as

Display technologyExtended reality devicesInformatics

Identifiers

PMID30929093
PMCPMC6919549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.