ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019
Revisiting a synthetic intracellular regulatory network that exhibits oscillations.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of Oscillatory Networks through Post-Translational Control of Network Components.Synthetic biology and engineering · 2023Article
- Efficient Framework Analysis for Targeted Drug Delivery Based on Internet of Bio-NanoThings.Arabian journal for science and engineering · 2021Article
- Comparison between Effects of Retroactivity and Resource Competition upon Change in Downstream Reporter Genes of Synthetic Genetic Circuits.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2000, Elowitz and Leibler introduced the repressilator-a synthetic gene circuit with three genes that cyclically repress transcription of the next gene-as well as a corresponding mathematical model. Experimental data and model simulations exhibited oscillations in the protein concentrations across generations. Müller et al. (J Math Biol 53(6):905-937, 2006) generalized the model to an arbitrary number of genes and analyzed the resulting dynamics. Their new model arose from five key assumptions, two of which are restrictive given current biological knowledge. Accordingly, we propose a new repressilator system that allows for general functions to model transcription, degradation, and translation. We prove that, with an odd number of genes, the new model has a unique steady state and the system converges to this steady state or to a periodic orbit. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for stability of steady states when the number of genes is even and conjecture a condition for stability for an odd number. Finally, we derive a new rate function describing transcription that arises under more reasonable biological assumptions than the widely used single-step binding assumption. With this new transcription-rate function, we compare the model's amplitude and period with that of a model with the conventional transcription-rate function. Taken together, our results enhance our understanding of genetic regulation by repression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30929046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.