Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30929033›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Force perception at the shoulder after a unilateral suprascapular nerve block.

David Phillips, Peter Kosek, Andrew Karduna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David PhillipsDepartment of Exercise Science and Physical Education, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ, 07043, USA. phillipsdav@montclair.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2513-6831
Peter KosekOregon Neurosurgery, 3355 Riverbend Drive, Suite 400, Springfield, OR, 97477, USA.
Andrew KardunaDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, 1240, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.

Funding

Neurophysiology of Weakness and Exercise in Rotator Cuff TendinopathyR01AR063713 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI KARDUNA, ANDREW ROBERT · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS 5R01AR063713NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two key sources of information that can be used to match forces-the centrally generated sense of effort and afferent signals from mechanical receptors located in peripheral tissues. There is currently no consensus on which source of information is more important for matching forces. The corollary discharge hypothesis argues that subjects match forces using the centrally generated sense of effort. The purpose of this study was to investigate force matching at the shoulder before and after a suprascapular nerve block. The nerve block creates a sensory and muscle force mismatch between sides when matching loads. The torque matching accuracy did not change after the nerve block was administered. Directionally, the torque error was in the direction proposed by the corollary discharge hypothesis. However, the mismatch between deltoid EMG was substantially greater compared to the changes in the torque matching error after the block. The results support that sensory information is used during force matching tasks. However, since the nerve block also created a sensory disruption between sides, it is not clear how sensory information is reweighted following the nerve block and a role for sense of effort is still implicated.

Indexed as

AdultBrachial PlexusElectromyographyFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle, SkeletalNerve BlockPerceptionShoulderYoung AdultDeltoidEMGForce perceptionIsometric ramp contractionSuprascapular nerveSupraspinatus

Identifiers

PMID30929033
PMCPMC8525189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.