Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30929026›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2019

Adjuvanted influenza vaccine for the Italian elderly in the 2018/19 season: an updated health technology assessment.

Chiara de Waure, Sara Boccalini, Paolo Bonanni, Daniela Amicizia, Andrea Poscia, Angela Bechini, Marco Barbieri, Stefano Capri, Maria Lucia Specchia, Maria Luisa Di Pietro and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immunology of Aging: the Birth of Inflammaging.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. The New Quadrivalent Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine for the Italian Elderly: A Health Technology Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara de WaureInstitute of Public Health - Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Sara BoccaliniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Paolo BonanniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Daniela AmiciziaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea PosciaInstitute of Public Health - Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Angela BechiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marco BarbieriCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Stefano CapriSchool of Economics and Management, Cattaneo LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy.
Maria Lucia SpecchiaInstitute of Public Health - Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Maria Luisa Di PietroInstitute of Public Health - Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Lucia ArataDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Pasquale CacciatoreInstitute of Public Health - Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Doanatella PanattoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Roberto GaspariniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity Carlo Cattaneo · ITUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe elderly, defined here as subjects aged ≥ 65 years, are among at-risk subjects for whom annual influenza vaccination is recommended. For the 2018/19 season, three vaccine types are available for the elderly in Italy: trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV), adjuvanted TIV (aTIV) and quadrivalent inactivated vaccines (QIV). No health technology assessment (HTA) of seasonal influenza vaccination in the elderly has previously been conducted in Italy.

methodsAn HTA was conducted in 2017 to analyze the burden of influenza illness, the characteristics, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of available vaccines and the related organizational and ethical implications. This was then contextualized to the 2018/19 influenza season. Comprehensive literature reviews/analyses were performed and a static mathematical model developed in order to address the above issues.

resultsIn Italy, influenza is usually less common in the elderly than in other age-classes, but the burden of disease is the highest; >10% of infected elderly subjects develop complications, and about 90% of all influenza-related deaths occur in this age-class. All available vaccines are effective, safe and acceptable from an ethical standpoint. However, aTIV has proved more immunogenic and effective in the elderly. Furthermore, from the third payer's perspective, aTIV is highly cost-effective and cost-saving in comparison with TIV and QIV, respectively. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage needs to be improved.

conclusionsAccording to this HTA, aTIV appeared the vaccine of choice in the elderly. HTA should be reapplied whenever new relevant data become available.

Indexed as

Technology Assessment, BiomedicalAdjuvants, ImmunologicAgedAge FactorsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesItalyTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30929026
PMCPMC6761839
OpenAlexW2930613931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.