ArticleJournal of radiation research2019
Patient organ doses from megavoltage computed tomography delivery with a helical tomotherapy unit using a general treatment planning system.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Out-of-field doses from radiotherapy using photon beams: A comparative study for a pediatric renal treatment.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to quantify actual patient organ doses from megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) using an MVCT beam model of a helical tomotherapy unit in a general treatment planning system (TPS). Dosimetric parameters (percentage depth dose, lateral beam profile, and longitudinal beam profile) of the MVCT beam were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 films (ISP Corporation, Wayne, NJ, USA) and used for beam modeling in a Pinnacle3 TPS (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands); this TPS is widely used with linear accelerators. The created beam model was adjusted and validated by assessing point doses in a cylindrical phantom in static and helical beam plans with fine, normal and coarse pitches. Maximum doses delivered to important organs from MVCT delivery for five clinical cases were calculated using the created beam model. The difference (average ± one standard deviation for all evaluation points) between calculated and measured doses was -0.69 ± 1.20% in the static beam plan. In the helical beam plan, the differences were 1.83 ± 2.65%, 1.35 ± 5.94% and -0.66 ± 8.48% for fine, normal and coarse pitches, respectively. The average maximum additional dose to important organs from MVCT in clinical cases was 0.82% of the prescribed dose. In conclusion, we investigated a method for quantifying patient organ dose from MVCT delivery on helical tomotherapy using an MVCT beam model in a general TPS. This technique enables estimation of the patient-specific organ dose from MVCT delivery, without the need for additional equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.