Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30928994›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Intact responses to non-drug rewards in long-term opioid maintenance treatment.

Marie Eikemo, Philipp P Lobmaier, Mads L Pedersen, Nikolaj Kunøe, Anna Maria Matziorinis, Siri Leknes, Monica Sarfi

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie EikemoNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. m.h.eikemo@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-919X
Philipp P LobmaierNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Mads L PedersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nikolaj KunøeNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anna Maria MatziorinisDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Siri LeknesDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Monica SarfiNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Care Services | Helse Sør-Øst RHF (Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority) 2013053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of non-drug reward processing in addiction could stem from long-term drug use, addiction-related psychosocial stress, or a combination of these. It remains unclear whether long-term opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) disrupts reward processing. Here, we measured subjective and objective reward responsiveness in 26 previously heroin-addicted mothers in >7 years stable OMT with minimal psychosocial stress and illicit drug use. The comparison group was 30 healthy age-matched mothers (COMP). Objective reward responsiveness was assessed in a two-alternative forced-choice task with skewed rewards. Results were also compared to performance from an additional 968 healthy volunteers (meta-analytic approach). We further compared subprocesses of reward-based decisions across groups using computational modelling with a Bayesian drift diffusion model of decision making. Self-reported responsiveness to non-drug rewards was high for both groups (means: OMT = 6.59, COMP = 6.67, p = 0.84, BF

Indexed as

Decision MakingRewardAdultBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansModels, PsychologicalOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30928994
PMCPMC6785711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.