Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30928956›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The ART of conversation: feasibility and acceptability of a pilot peer intervention to help transition complex HIV-positive people from hospital to community.

Andrew David Eaton, Soo Chan Carusone, Shelley L Craig, Erin Telegdi, John W McCullagh, David McClure, Walter Wilson, Leonardo Zuniga, Kevin Berney, Galo F Ginocchio and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient and provider perceptions of a peer-delivered intervention ('Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrew David EatonUniversity of Toronto, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1331-1222
Soo Chan CarusoneCasey House, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shelley L CraigUniversity of Toronto, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erin TelegdiCasey House, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John W McCullaghAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David McClureAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Walter WilsonAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leonardo ZunigaAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin BerneyAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Galo F GinocchioAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon A WellsAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael MontessAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adam BuschAIDS Committee of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nick BoyceOntario Harm Reduction Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carol StrikeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann StewartSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo pilot a peer-based intervention for people living with HIV who used substances, had challenges with antiretroviral adherence and would be discharged from hospital to community. STUDY

designA community-based, quasi-experimental pilot intervention study designed to assess feasibility, acceptability and connection to a community-based HIV organisation.

settingThis study was conducted in Toronto, Canada, at Casey House (CH; hospital for people living with HIV) in collaboration with the AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT; community-based HIV organisation).

participantsPeople living with HIV who were CH inpatient between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018, struggled with antiretroviral adherence, actively used substances and would be discharged to community were eligible. Forty people met criteria, 19 were approached by an inpatient nurse and 17 consented. Average age was 48.8 years (SD=11.4), 58.8% were male and participants averaged 7.8 physical and mental health comorbidities (SD=3.1).

interventionTitled 'The ART of Conversation', the three-pronged personalised intervention was developed through input from CH clients and ACT volunteers, all living with HIV. Intervention components were (a) predischarge goal-setting (adherence, substance use and self-identified goal) with the study nurse; (b) predischarge meeting with an HIV+ peer volunteer (PV) and (c) nine postdischarge phone calls between PV and participant, once per day for 3 days, then once per week for 6 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Feasibility was measured through proportion of eligible participants recruited and PV availability. Acceptability was assessed through participant interviews at three times (preintervention, post-intervention and 6 weeks follow-up) and through PV call logs. Client records determined connection to ACT within the study timeframe.

resultsTwelve participants completed the intervention and nine connected with ACT. Predischarge goal-setting and PV meeting were both feasible and acceptable. Postdischarge phone calls were a challenge as half of completers missed at least one call.

conclusionsAlthough predischarge goal-setting and PV meeting were feasible, methods to maintain connection following discharge require further investigation.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial SupportAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCanadaCounselingDrug MonitoringFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsAnti-HIV Agentsqualitative researchsocial medicinesubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID30928956
PMCPMC6475144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.