Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30928805›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2019

Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs.

Dylan V Neel, David S Shulman, Steven G DuBois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global regulatory variability in small-molecule inhibitor approvals: Differences in timelines, dosing, and pediatric indications across FDA, EMA, and PMDA.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Dosage Optimization of Pediatric Oncology Products: Our Patients Deserve Better.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Combination Early-Phase Trials of Anticancer Agents in Children and Adolescents.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dylan V NeelHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David S ShulmanDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven G DuBoisDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: steven_dubois@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
Research Training in Pediatric OncologyT32CA136432 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SCOTT A ARMSTRONG · 2009 to 2026
$7.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA136432NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe lag time between initial human studies of oncology agents and the first-in-child clinical trials of these agents has not been defined.

methodsWe conducted a systematic analysis of time from first-in-human trials to first-in-child trials (age of eligibility <18 years) of agents first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for any oncology indication from 1997 to 2017. We used clinical trial registry data, published literature and oncology abstracts to identify relevant trials and start dates.

resultsFrom 1997 to 2017, 126 drugs received initial FDA approval for an oncology indication. Of these, 117 were non-hormonal agents used in subsequent analyses. Fifteen of 117 drugs (12.8%) did not yet have a paediatric trial, and six of 117 drugs (5.1%) had an initial approval that included children. The median time between the first-in-human trial and first-in-child trial was 6.5 years (range 0-27.7 years). The median time from initial FDA approval to the first-in-child clinical trial was -0.66 years (range -43 to +19 years). These values were stable regardless of year of initial FDA approval, drug class and initial approved disease indication.

conclusionThe median lag time from first-in-human to first-in-child trials of oncology agents that were ultimately approved by FDA was 6.5 years. These results provide a benchmark against which to evaluate recent initiatives designed to hasten drug development relevant to children with cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChildClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic AgentsDisparityDrug developmentPaediatric cancerPhase 1 trialsTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID30928805
PMCPMC6491224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.