Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30928773›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2019

Developing zebrafish disease models for in vivo small molecule screens.

Pui-Ying Lam, Randall T Peterson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A New Hypoglycemic Prenylated Indole AlkaloidInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fishing for answers to hemostatic and thrombotic disease: Genome editing in zebrafish.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pui-Ying LamCollege of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
Randall T PetersonCollege of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States. Electronic address: randall.peterson@pharm.utah.edu.
University of Utah · US

Funding

ADVANCING ZINC FINGER NUCLEASES FOR TARGETED GENOME MANIPULATIONR01GM088040 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JOUNG, J. KEITH, PETERSON, RANDALL T · 2009 to 2016
$4.5M
Modulation of Hepcidin-Ferroportin Signaling using Small MoleculesR01DK082971 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BLOCH, DONALD B, PETERSON, RANDALL T · 2009 to 2018
$4.5M
Chemical genetic modifiers of acute myelogenous leukemiaR01CA118498 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PETERSON, RANDALL T · 2006 to 2008
$676k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118498NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082971NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish is a model organism that allows in vivo studies to be performed at a scale usually restricted to in vitro studies. As such, the zebrafish is well suited to in vivo screens, in which thousands of small molecules are tested for their ability to modify disease phenotypes in zebrafish disease models. Numerous approaches have been developed for modeling human diseases in zebrafish, including mutagenesis, transgenesis, pharmacological approaches, wounding, and exposure to infectious or cancerous agents. We review the various strategies for modeling human diseases in zebrafish and discuss important considerations when developing zebrafish models for use in in vivo small molecule screens.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalZebrafishAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMutagenesisRegenerationWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID30928773
PMCPMC6800242
OpenAlexW2932584663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.