Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30927944›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2019

Radiogenomics of rectal adenocarcinoma in the era of precision medicine: A pilot study of associations between qualitative and quantitative MRI imaging features and genetic mutations.

Natally Horvat, Harini Veeraraghavan, Raphael A Pelossof, Maria Clara Fernandes, Arshi Arora, Monika Khan, Michael Marco, Chin-Tung Cheng, Mithat Gonen, Jennifer S Golia Pernicka and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Artificial Intelligence and Precision Medicine: A Perspective.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Natally HorvatDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Harini VeeraraghavanDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Raphael A PelossofDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Maria Clara FernandesDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Fleury, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arshi AroraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Monika KhanDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael MarcoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Chin-Tung ChengDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer S Golia PernickaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marc J GollubDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Julio Garcia-AguillarDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Iva PetkovskaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: petkovsi@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate associations between genetic mutations and qualitative as well as quantitative features on MRI in rectal adenocarcinoma at primary staging.

methodsIn this retrospective study, patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, genome sequencing, and pretreatment rectal MRI were included. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate associations between qualitative features obtained from subjective evaluation of rectal MRI and gene mutations as well as between quantitative textural features and gene mutations. For the qualitative evaluation, Fisher's Exact test was used to analyze categorical associations and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used for continuous clinical variables. For the quantitative evaluation, we performed manual segmentation of T2-weighted images for radiomics-based quantitative image analysis. Thirty-four texture features consisting of first order intensity histogram-based features (n = 4), second order Haralick textures (n = 5), and Gabor-edge based Haralick textures were computed at two different orientations. Consensus clustering was performed with 34 computed texture features using the K-means algorithm with Euclidean distance between the texture features. The clusters resulting from the algorithm were then used to enumerate the prevalence of gene mutations in those clusters.

resultsIn 65 patients, 45 genes were mutated in more than 3/65 patients (5%) and were included in the statistical analysis. Regarding qualitative imaging features, on univariate analysis, tumor location was significantly associated with APC (p = 0.032) and RASA1 mutation (p = 0.032); CRM status was significantly associated with ATM mutation (p = 0.021); and lymph node metastasis was significantly associated with BRCA2 (p = 0.046) mutation. However, these associations were not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Regarding quantitative imaging features, Cluster C1 had tumors with higher mean Gabor edge intensity compared with cluster C2 (θ = 0°, p = 0.018; θ = 45°, p = 0.047; θ = 90°, p = 0.037; cluster C3 (θ = 0°, p = 0.18; θ = 45°, p = 0.1; θ = 90°, p = 0.052), and cluster C4 (θ = 0°, p = 0.016; θ = 45°, p = 0.033; θ = 90°, p = 0.014) suggesting that the cluster C1 had tumors with more distinct edges or heterogeneous appearance compared with other clusters.

conclusionsAlthough this preliminary study showed promising associations between quantitative features and genetic mutations, it did not show any correlation between qualitative features and genetic mutations. Further studies with larger sample size are warranted to validate our preliminary data.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGenes, NeoplasmGenomicsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMutationPilot ProjectsRectal NeoplasmsGenomicsMagnetic resonance imagingPrecision medicineRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30927944
PMCPMC6443100
OpenAlexW2915340536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.